IMPORTANT QUESTIONS REMAIN

Publish Date:  7 July 2016
Revised:  22 July 2016

As we watched the Congressional hearing of FBI Director James Comey on the Inspector General's referral regarding Hillary Clinton's e-mail breach, we continue to be flabbergasted with the political circus.  There are some questions of import that  are not being asked.  SPEAROFATHENA asks them here:

• Given the extremely high level profile of this investigation, FBI Director James Comey testified that his staff, not him personally, performed the recent 3.5 hour interview of Hillary Clinton.  Why didn't he conduct the interview personally or at least attend it?
• Why was the above interview not conducted under oath?
• Hillary Clinton's e-mails were reviewed by her legal staff (i.e. staff who were under contract with Clinton) prior to release to the FBI.   Prior to release, 30,000+ e-mails were removed by this staff being deemed irrelevant to the investigation. This would have taken much effort resulting in considerable costs.  How can Hillary Clinton state that she did not know about this activity considering the Clintons are the ones paying for the legal services?
• If it is somehow true that Hillary Clinton did not know about server scrubbing to ensure destruction of information, then who was it who ordered the scrubbing?
• Where is the Clinton server now? 
• It is virtually irrefutable that Hillary Clinton has lied on several issues pertaining to the e-mail security breach.   Why not has Hillary Clinton at least been charged with lying to the FBI?
• Why was Hillary Clinton interviewed so late in the investigation's process?

Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani gave a passionate speech at the start of the RNC this week.  It included a challenge to Hillary Clinton regarding her alleged felonies against the United States.  Will we really see her prosecution if Trump is elected in November?