IS HILLARY CLINTON PRO-ISIS (DAESH) ?
Publish Date: 31 July 2016
It has been noted by analysts that Hillary Clinton has mentioned ISIS (Daesh) about 25 times whereas Donald Trump has mentioned them at least 500 times over the last week or so. Why is this the case?
The Democrats and Hillary Clinton' s avoidance of ISIS discussion is unlikely to be an accident. For us to be wrong, the Democrats would have to be very out of touch with reality. Increasing numbers of reputable groups have charged that the Obama administration and Clinton have promoted ISIS as a means to destabilize the Middle East in order to relieve the danger Islam poses to Israel. We believe that this is true and grossly irresponsible but something eqaully sinister lurks within the campaign.
The Democratic platform, that is based on the belief that all people are equal and wish to live in harmony with each other, has been proven unworkable by world events. As Dr. Gorka states: "imagine if Imams were beheaded in mosques by Christians in the USA" and their videos then uploaded to YOUTUBE. The backlash would be severe. Why are these horrific events, that are carried out by well-defined cells (ISIS and numerous terror groups) within a specific demographic (the Muslim religion), not dealt with decisively. The reason is that if the danger was, it would show that the Democratic platform is based on false foundations.
The Republicans understand that liberal ideals are good, but the application of them in the hope of appeasing groups who do not believe in integration is naive and dangerous (a Sharia court is a no-go zone for a female rights advocate). Hillary Clinton, in order to keep the liberal and left-wing vote, must underplay the Fundamentalist threat. Hillary, by not resisting ISIS to the extents needed, is complicit in its survival.
Please comment below.